Dilbert Comics
Is it extremely rare during the software lifecycle to jettison most of the automated test tools, and then…?
claim there are few faults in the supposedly “enhanced” system.
Or would this only happen in a Dilbert comic ?
What about if it’s “safety-critical” software ?
Surely no one would do it then.
It is not extremely rare for automated tools to be abandoned during software testing due to the limitations inherent with them. It would be extemely rare for the shortfall to be not covered off by manual testing. Most all software is ‘mission critical’ these days and the effort and investment in the testing component of the software development lifecycle reflects this…
Learning new tricks, relearning work, play difference
You can subtitle this one, “Old dog learns new trick.”
